By Nina Kendall
I recently attended a session
at the Organization of American Historians Meeting titled "Conceptualizing
Black Life, Community, and Protest in the Borderland." This session began
by redefining borderland and describing recent increased interest in borderland
history. The featured historians went on to assert that what one might
traditional think of a border states might better be described as an amorphous
borderland region.
Developing an understanding
of historical regions as a way to better understand events of the past is
fascinating. What would define the "borderland region"
between the North and South? How would it be described? What types of data
would be used? Would this region be fixed? Does it change over time?
Both Historians who spoke
made an effort to employ this understanding and define the region. Here are the
details they offered:
___________________________________________________________________________
Place in Region: Baltimore,
Maryland
Date: 1930s-1940s
Characteristics: size at time
800,000, industrialized like the North, culturally Southern, 2nd busiest ports,
large working class developed, edge of BOSNYWASH,
Profoundly segregationist
Transformations: Growth of NAACP to
numbers, worked on integrating colleges, improved teacher pay, then worked with
industrial unionism
Interesting trends: Movements in
World War II collide as migration to cities made battlegrounds of the workplace
and segregated neighborhoods.
___________________________________________________________________________
Place: Cairo, Illinois
Characteristics: It is
seen as border cities. (Other Border Cities: Louisville, Cincinnati,
Evansville)
Physical Geography: between Ohio
River and Mississippi River. Border states more of borderland region.
Other Characteristics: practices
slavery, no plantation agriculture, 20%-30% black population, culturally
southern, political economy= political mindframe, segregation practiced by
tradition less codified by law.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The goal of this description was to
establish a context to help foster understanding how and why Black Life in
these communities was different from other communities. What do you think? Can you find similarities
in their understanding of this region? Do you see the role of the region in a
historical context?
This is certainly the type of
thinking that could be replicated in the classroom. Students can identify and define
regions. They can investigate how these contexts change the dynamics of
political and social relationships. This is an activity that could be helpful
in understanding developments in the Colonial America, violence during
Reconstruction, expansion of suffrage in the West, or used to explore frontier
opportunity.
What will you teach absolute location or relative location influenced region?
No comments:
Post a Comment